Re: A failure in prepared_xacts test

On Mon, Apr 29, 2024 at 2:58 PM Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> wrote:

> On Mon, Apr 29, 2024 at 01:32:40AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> > (BTW, on the same logic, should ecpg's twophase.pgc be using a
> > prepared-transaction name that's less generic than "gxid"?)
>
> I've hesitated a few seconds about that before sending my patch, but
> refrained because this stuff does not care about the contents of
> pg_prepared_xacts.  I'd be OK to use something like an "ecpg_regress"
> or something similar there.


I noticed that some TAP tests from recovery and subscription would
select the count from pg_prepared_xacts.  I wonder if these tests would
be affected if there are any prepared transactions on the backend.

Thanks
Richard