Re: Reduce "Var IS [NOT] NULL" quals during constant folding
Richard Guo <guofenglinux@gmail.com>
From: Richard Guo <guofenglinux@gmail.com>
To: Andrei Lepikhov <lepihov@gmail.com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter@eisentraut.org>, David Rowley <dgrowleyml@gmail.com>, Tender Wang <tndrwang@gmail.com>,
Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>
Date: 2025-07-02T09:14:48Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Commits
Same data as JSON:
GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits
the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources.
API reference →
-
Fix misuse of Relids for storing attribute numbers
- 2d756ebbe857 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Reduce "Var IS [NOT] NULL" quals during constant folding
- e2debb64380e 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Centralize collection of catalog info needed early in the planner
- 904f6a593a06 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Expand virtual generated columns before sublink pull-up
- e0d05295268e 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Expand virtual generated columns in the planner
- 1e4351af329f 18.0 cited
On Wed, Jul 2, 2025 at 4:32 PM Andrei Lepikhov <lepihov@gmail.com> wrote: > I must say that I appreciate Tom's idea and see significant benefits in > making the parse tree a read-only structure. In complex queries, it can > be frustrating to make copies of the parse tree, leading to complaints > from users about insufficient memory allocation. This is why, in our > enterprise fork, we support a specific option to avoid copying the parse > tree multiple times. I don't see how the changes in this patchset violate Tom's proposal regarding keeping the parse tree read-only. The only potential issue I can see is that we may clear the rte->inh flag in some cases -- but that behavior has existed for a long time, not starting from this patchset. > Therefore, it would be better to find a way to refactor the > `preprocess_relation_rtes` function to gather table statistics lazily > into the hash table when they are needed. For example, we could do this > at the moment of creating the `RelOptInfo` or before a subquery pull-up, > without modifying the RTE at all. All the catalog information collected in preprocess_relation_rtes() is needed very early in the planner. I don't see how we could move that logic to a later stage, such as at the moment of creating RelOptInfos as you mentioned. Thanks Richard