Re: BUG #18422: Assert in expandTupleDesc() fails on row mismatch with additional SRF

Richard Guo <guofenglinux@gmail.com>

From: Richard Guo <guofenglinux@gmail.com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: Tender Wang <tndrwang@gmail.com>, exclusion@gmail.com, pgsql-bugs@lists.postgresql.org
Date: 2024-04-12T03:25:49Z
Lists: pgsql-bugs
On Thu, Apr 11, 2024 at 10:13 PM Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:

> Richard Guo <guofenglinux@gmail.com> writes:
> > Do you think we can have a parameter in the new get_expr_result_rtfunc()
> > function to indicate whether we want to build an intermediate tupdesc
> > when we have a coldeflist?  Then we can set it to true in the two places
> > that are correct already, and set it to false at the places we need to
> > fix.  But I'm not sure if including such a new parameter would be an
> > improvement or just make it worse.
>
> I did think about that, but it seems mighty weird.  The semantics of
> the flag would have to be something like "I want a tupdesc when the
> result type is COMPOSITE, but not when it's RECORD", which seems
> rather arbitrary.


Indeed.


> Perhaps it'd be sufficient to add a note to the header comment of
> get_expr_result_type warning about when not to use it.


Works for me.

Thanks
Richard

Commits

  1. Fix type-checking of RECORD-returning functions in FROM, redux.