Re: failing to use index on UNION of matviews (Re: postgresql 10.1 wrong plan in when using partitions bug)

>
>
>>
>> Setting enable_seqscan=off takes one of the shorter queries I was working
>> with from about 3 minutes to 300ms.   This is a comparable performance
>> improvement to where I put a materialized view (with indexes) on top of the
>> materialized views instead of using a simple view on top of the
>> materialized views.  I'll have to try it with the query that takes 12 hours.
>>
>>
>
The query that takes 12 hours and won't use indexes when I feel it should
is a materialized view refresh.  When I set it before testing the plan with
a simple explain on the query it definitely gets it to use all of the
indexes.  Does setting something like "enable_seqscan=off" work when I
follow it with a "refresh materialized view concurrently" instead of a
simple select?   I'll try it to see if it helps the refresh time, but I
thought I'd ask.

(I got pulled into another problem since my last email, so I haven't had a
chance to follow up.)