Re: More new SQL/JSON item methods

On Thu, Jan 18, 2024 at 1:03 AM Peter Eisentraut <peter@eisentraut.org>
wrote:

> On 17.01.24 10:03, Jeevan Chalke wrote:
> > I added unary '+' and '-' support as well and thus thought of having
> > separate rules altogether rather than folding those in.
> >
> >     Per SQL standard, the precision and scale arguments are unsigned
> >     integers, so unary plus and minus signs are not supported.  So my
> patch
> >     removes that support, but I didn't adjust the regression tests for
> that.
> >
> >
> > However, PostgreSQL numeric casting does support a negative scale. Here
> > is an example:
> >
> > # select '12345'::numeric(4,-2);
> >   numeric
> > ---------
> >     12300
> > (1 row)
> >
> > And thus thought of supporting those.
> > Do we want this JSON item method to behave differently here?
>
> Ok, it would make sense to support this in SQL/JSON as well.
>

OK. So with this, we don't need changes done in your 0001 patches.


>
> > I will merge them all into one and will try to keep them in the order
> > specified in sql_features.txt.
> > However, for documentation, it makes more sense to keep them in logical
> > order than the alphabetical one. What are your views on this?
>
> The documentation can be in a different order.
>

Thanks, Andrew and Peter for the confirmation.

Attached merged single patch along these lines.

Peter, I didn't understand why the changes you did in your 0002 patch were
required here. I did run the pgindent, and it didn't complain to me. So,
just curious to know more about the changes. I have not merged those
changes in this single patch. However, if needed it can be cleanly applied
on top of this single patch.

Thanks


-- 
Jeevan Chalke

*Principal, ManagerProduct Development*



edbpostgres.com