Re: block-level incremental backup
Jeevan Chalke <jeevan.chalke@enterprisedb.com>
From: Jeevan Chalke <jeevan.chalke@enterprisedb.com>
To: Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut@gmail.com>
Cc: vignesh C <vignesh21@gmail.com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>, Anastasia Lubennikova <a.lubennikova@postgrespro.ru>,
Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>
Date: 2019-09-09T11:47:39Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Sep 3, 2019 at 12:11 PM Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut@gmail.com> wrote: > On Fri, Aug 16, 2019 at 3:54 PM Jeevan Chalke > <jeevan.chalke@enterprisedb.com> wrote: > > > 0003: > +/* > + * When to send the whole file, % blocks modified (90%) > + */ > +#define WHOLE_FILE_THRESHOLD 0.9 > > How this threshold is selected. Is it by some test? > Currently, it is set arbitrarily. If required, we will make it a GUC. > > - magic number, currently 0 (4 bytes) > I think in the patch we are using (#define INCREMENTAL_BACKUP_MAGIC > 0x494E4352) as a magic number, not 0 > Yes. Robert too reported this. Updated the commit message. > > Can we breakdown this function in 2-3 functions. At least creating a > file map can directly go to a separate function. > Separated out filemap changes to separate function. Rest kept as is to have an easy followup. > > I have read 0003 and 0004 patch and there are few cosmetic comments. > Can you please post those too? Other comments are fixed. > > > -- > Regards, > Dilip Kumar > EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com > Thanks -- Jeevan Chalke Technical Architect, Product Development EnterpriseDB Corporation The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company