Re: Speed dblink using alternate libpq tuple storage
Kyotaro Horiguchi <horiguchi.kyotaro@oss.ntt.co.jp>
From: Kyotaro HORIGUCHI <horiguchi.kyotaro@oss.ntt.co.jp>
To: Marko Kreen <markokr@gmail.com>
Cc: greg@2ndquadrant.com, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org, mmoncure@gmail.com, shigeru.hanada@gmail.com
Date: 2012-02-21T11:15:07Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Commits
Same data as JSON:
GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits
the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources.
API reference →
-
Fix COPY FROM for null marker strings that correspond to invalid encoding.
- e8476f46fc84 9.2.0 cited
-
Improve labeling of pg_test_fsync open_sync test output.
- 2bbd88f8f841 9.2.0 cited
Thank you. Everything seems clear. Please wait for a while. > PQskipResult: > - store old callback and param in local vars > - set do-nothing row callback > - call PQgetresu > > On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 12:13 PM, Kyotaro HORIGUCHI > <horiguchi.kyotaro@oss.ntt.co.jp> wrote: > >> > - PQskipResult(conn, true) makes all consequent PQgetResult()'s > >> > to skip all the rows. > > > > Well, Is this right? > > Yes, call getResult() until it returns NULL. > > >> > If this is right, row processor should stay also in PGresult > >> > context. PQskipResult() replaces the row processor in PGconn when > >> > the second parameter is true, and in PGresult for false. > >> > >> No, let's keep row processor only under PGconn. > > > > Then, Should I add the stash for the row processor (and needless > > for param) to recall after in PGconn? > > PQskipResult: > - store old callback and param in local vars > - set do-nothing row callback > - call PQgetresult() once, or until it returns NULL > - restore old callback > - return 1 if last result was non-NULL, 0 otherwise > > -- > marko > >