Re: Rename max_parallel_degree?

Peter Geoghegan <pg@heroku.com>

From: Peter Geoghegan <pg@heroku.com>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com>
Cc: Josh berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>, Noah Misch <noah@leadboat.com>, David Rowley <david.rowley@2ndquadrant.com>, Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>, Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>, Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2016-05-31T18:18:13Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 11:17 AM, Peter Eisentraut
<peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> Changing the explain output doesn't sound so bad to me.
>
> The users' problem is that the parameter setting ought to match the EXPLAIN
> output.
>
> The developers' problem is that the EXPLAIN output actually corresponds to
> leader + (N-1) workers internally.
>
> I think we can hope that developers are going to be less confused about that
> than users.

+1.


-- 
Peter Geoghegan