Re: Performance Improvement by reducing WAL for Update Operation
Peter Geoghegan <pg@heroku.com>
From: Peter Geoghegan <pg@heroku.com>
To: Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com>,
Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>,
Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>,
Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakangas@vmware.com>,
pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>,
Mike Blackwell <mike.blackwell@rrd.com>
Date: 2014-02-04T21:50:10Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Feb 4, 2014 at 11:11 AM, Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: >> Does this feature relate to compression of WAL page images at all? > > No. So the obvious question is: where, if anywhere, do the two efforts (this patch, and Fujii's patch) overlap? Does Fujii have any concerns about this patch as it relates to his effort to compress FPIs? -- Peter Geoghegan
Commits
-
Flush stderr and stdout in isolation tester.
- 63d283ecd0bc 9.3.0 cited