Horton

Re: Performance Improvement by reducing WAL for Update Operation

Peter Geoghegan <pg@heroku.com>

View thread View on postgr.es
From: Peter Geoghegan <pg@heroku.com>
To: Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com>
Cc: Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com>, Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>, Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakangas@vmware.com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>, Mike Blackwell <mike.blackwell@rrd.com>
Date: 2014-02-04T22:03:15Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers 
On Tue, Feb 4, 2014 at 1:58 PM, Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> I think there's zero overlap. They're completely complimentary features. It's not like normal WAL records have an irrelevant volume.

I'd have thought so too, but I would not like to assume. Like many
people commenting on this thread, I don't know very much about
compression.


-- 
Peter Geoghegan

Commits

  1. Flush stderr and stdout in isolation tester.