Re: Parallel tuplesort (for parallel B-Tree index creation)
Peter Geoghegan <pg@heroku.com>
On Wed, Dec 21, 2016 at 10:21 AM, Peter Geoghegan <pg@heroku.com> wrote: > On Wed, Dec 21, 2016 at 6:00 AM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote: >> 3. Just live with the waste of space. > > I am loathe to create a special case for the parallel interface too, > but I think it's possible that *no* caller will ever actually need to > live with this restriction at any time in the future. I just realized that you were actually talking about the waste of space in workers here, as opposed to the theoretical waste of space that would occur in the leader should there ever be a parallel randomAccess tuplesort caller. To be clear, I am totally against allowing a waste of logtape.c temp file space in *workers*, because that implies a cost that will most certainly be felt by users all the time. -- Peter Geoghegan
Commits
-
Support parallel btree index builds.
- 9da0cc35284b 11.0 landed
-
Report an ERROR if a parallel worker fails to start properly.
- 2badb5afb89c 11.0 cited
-
Transfer state pertaining to pending REINDEX operations to workers.
- 29d58fd3adae 11.0 landed
-
Add a barrier primitive for synchronizing backends.
- 1145acc70deb 11.0 cited
-
Allow DML commands that create tables to use parallel query.
- e9baa5e9fa14 11.0 cited
-
Refactor GetOldestXmin() to use flags
- af4b1a0869bd 10.0 cited
-
Fix regression in parallel planning against inheritance tables.
- 2609e91fcf9d 10.0 cited
-
Don't create "holes" in BufFiles, in the new logtape code.
- 7ac4a389a7db 10.0 cited
-
Simplify the code for logical tape read buffers.
- b75f467b6eec 10.0 cited
-
Fix excessive memory consumption in the new sort pre-reading code.
- b56fb691b003 10.0 cited
-
Implement binary heap replace-top operation in a smarter way.
- 24598337c8d2 10.0 cited
-
Cosmetic code cleanup in commands/extension.c.
- 25794e841e5b 10.0 cited
-
Speed up planner's scanning for parallel-query hazards.
- da1c91631e35 10.0 cited
-
Read from the same worker repeatedly until it returns no tuple.
- bc7fcab5e36b 9.6.0 cited
-
Improve tuplesort.c to support variable merge order. The original coding
- df700e6b4019 8.2.0 cited