Re: fdatasync performance problem with large number of DB files
Greg Stark <stark@mit.edu>
From: Greg Stark <stark@mit.edu>
To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com>,
Michael Brown <michael.brown@discourse.org>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2021-03-21T07:55:02Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Wed, 10 Mar 2021 at 20:25, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > > So this means that in less-than-bleeding-edge kernels, syncfs can > only be regarded as a dangerous toy. If we expose an option to use > it, there had better be large blinking warnings in the docs. Isn't that true for fsync and everything else related on less-than-bleeding-edge kernels anyways? -- greg
Commits
-
Change recovery_init_sync_method to PGC_SIGHUP.
- 34a8b64b4e5f 14.0 landed
-
Provide recovery_init_sync_method=syncfs.
- 61752afb2640 14.0 landed