Re: ALTER SYSTEM SET command to change postgresql.conf parameters (RE: Proposal for Allow postgresql.conf values to be changed via SQL [review])
Greg Stark <stark@mit.edu>
From: Greg Stark <stark@mit.edu>
To: Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri@2ndquadrant.fr>
Cc: Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com>,
Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>,
Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>,
Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>, Amit Kapila <amit.kapila@huawei.com>,
pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Date: 2013-08-01T14:17:04Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
We don't need per guc locking. This is the whole objection Tom had about this patch being more complex than it has to be. -- greg On 1 Aug 2013 14:55, "Dimitri Fontaine" <dimitri@2ndquadrant.fr> wrote: > Greg Stark <stark@mit.edu> writes: > > I think people are going to laugh at us if an open source database > > software can't manage a simple flat file database of settings, > > especially one that is purely write-only and can be a simple dump of > > settings that are set by alter system. > > So you say it's easier to implement per-GUC locking semantics correctly > when using a single file with multiple units of information that all are > of the same type? Interesting. > > Maybe the storage should actually be a shared catalog, in fact. > > Regards, > -- > Dimitri Fontaine > http://2ndQuadrant.fr PostgreSQL : Expertise, Formation et Support > > > -- > Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) > To make changes to your subscription: > http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers >