Re: measuring lwlock-related latency spikes
Greg Stark <stark@mit.edu>
From: Greg Stark <stark@mit.edu>
To: Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Date: 2012-04-02T20:06:24Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Commits
Same data as JSON:
GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits
the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources.
API reference →
-
Add new files to NLS file lists
- 194b5ea3d072 9.2.0 cited
On Mon, Apr 2, 2012 at 8:16 PM, Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > Agreed, though I think it means the fsync is happening on a filesystem > that causes a full system fsync. That time is not normal. I don't know what you mean. It looks like there are two cases where this code path executes. Either more than 16 clog files are being flushed by the SimpleLRUFlush() during a checkpoint or a dirty page is being evicted by SlruSelectLRUPage(). I don't know that 16 is so crazy a number of clog files to be touching between checkpoints any more on a big machine like this. The number of clog files active concurrently in pgbench should be related to how quickly xids are being used up and how large the database is -- both of which are pretty big in these tests. Perhaps the 16 should have been raised to 32 when CLOGShmemBuffers was raised to 32. -- greg