Re: [PATCH] Optional OR REPLACE in CREATE OPERATOR statement

On Tue, 5 Jul 2022 at 11:29, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>
> No, that's not acceptable.  CREATE OR REPLACE should always produce
> exactly the same final state of the object, but in this case we cannot
> change the underlying function if the operator already exists.

It sounds like this patch isn't the direction to go in. I don't know
if IF NOT EXISTS is better but that design discussion should probably
happen after this commitfest.

I'm sorry but I guess I'll mark this patch Rejected.

-- 
Gregory Stark
As Commitfest Manager