Horton

Re: WAL format changes

Greg Stark <stark@mit.edu>

View thread
From: Greg Stark <stark@mit.edu>
To: Heikki Linnakangas <heikki.linnakangas@enterprisedb.com>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2012-07-06T21:24:12Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Commits

Same data as JSON: GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources. API reference →

  1. Update pgindent install instructions and update typedef list.

On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 10:01 PM, Heikki Linnakangas
<heikki.linnakangas@enterprisedb.com> wrote:
> This has the advantage that you can calculate the CRC for all the other
> fields before acquiring WALInsertLock. For xl_prev, you need to know where
> exactly the record is inserted, so it's handy that it's the last field
> before CRC.

It may be late to mention this but fwiw you don't need to reorder the
fields to do this. CRC has the property that you can easily adjust it
for any changes to the data covered by it. Regardless of where the
xl_prev link is you can calculate the CRC as if xl_prev is 0 and then
once you get the lock "add in" the correct xl_prev. This is an
argument in favour of using CRC over other checksums for which that
would be hard or impossible.

-- 
greg