Re: Minmax indexes
Greg Stark <stark@mit.edu>
From: Greg Stark <stark@mit.edu>
To: Claudio Freire <klaussfreire@gmail.com>
Cc: Thom Brown <thom@linux.com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>,
Erik Rijkers <er@xs4all.nl>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2014-01-25T01:56:21Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Fri, Jan 24, 2014 at 12:58 PM, Claudio Freire <klaussfreire@gmail.com> wrote: > > What's the status? > > I believe I have more than a use for minmax indexes, and wouldn't mind > lending a hand if it's within my grasp. I'm also interested in looking at this. Mostly because I have ideas for other "summary" functions that would be interesting and could use the same infrastructure otherwise. -- greg
Commits
-
Refactor per-page logic common to all redo routines to a new function.
- f8f4227976a2 9.5.0 cited
-
Reduce use of heavyweight locking inside hash AM.
- 76837c1507cb 9.3.0 cited
-
Scan the buffer pool just once, not once per fork, during relation drop.
- ece01aae4792 9.2.0 cited
-
Major patch from Thomas Lockhart <Thomas.G.Lockhart@jpl.nasa.gov>
- 9e2a87b62db8 7.1.1 cited