Re: Let's make PostgreSQL multi-threaded
Greg Stark <stark@mit.edu>
From: Greg Stark <stark@mit.edu>
To: Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Cc: Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka@iki.fi>,
pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2023-06-08T14:33:26Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Wed, 7 Jun 2023 at 18:09, Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> wrote: > Having the same memory mapping between threads makes allows the > hardware to share the TLB (on x86 via process context identifiers), which > isn't realistically possible with different processes. As a matter of historical interest Solaris actually did implement this across different processes. It was called by the somewhat unfortunate name "Intimate Shared Memory". I don't think Linux ever implemented anything like it but I'm not sure. I think this was not so much about cache hit rate but about just sheer wasted memory in page mappings. So I guess hugepages more or less target the same issues. But I find it interesting that they were already running into issues like this 20 years ago -- presumably those issues have only grown. -- greg