Re: block-level incremental backup

Ibrar Ahmed <ibrar.ahmad@gmail.com>

From: Ibrar Ahmed <ibrar.ahmad@gmail.com>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Cc: Jeevan Ladhe <jeevan.ladhe@enterprisedb.com>, Jeevan Chalke <jeevan.chalke@enterprisedb.com>, vignesh C <vignesh21@gmail.com>, Anastasia Lubennikova <a.lubennikova@postgrespro.ru>, Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>
Date: 2019-09-03T16:46:13Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Commits

Same data as JSON: GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources. API reference →
  1. Don't call data type input functions in GUC check hooks

On Tue, Sep 3, 2019 at 7:39 PM Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Tue, Sep 3, 2019 at 10:05 AM Ibrar Ahmed <ibrar.ahmad@gmail.com> wrote:
> > +1 using the library to tar. But I think reason not using tar library is
> TAR is
> > one of the most simple file format. What is the best/newest format of
> TAR?
>
> So, I don't really want to go down this path at all, as I already
> said.  You can certainly do your own research on this topic if you
> wish.
>
> I did that and have experience working on the TAR format.  I was curious
about what
"best/newest" you are talking.



> --
> Robert Haas
> EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
> The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
>


-- 
Ibrar Ahmed