Re: block-level incremental backup
Ibrar Ahmed <ibrar.ahmad@gmail.com>
From: Ibrar Ahmed <ibrar.ahmad@gmail.com>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Cc: Jeevan Ladhe <jeevan.ladhe@enterprisedb.com>, Jeevan Chalke <jeevan.chalke@enterprisedb.com>,
vignesh C <vignesh21@gmail.com>, Anastasia Lubennikova <a.lubennikova@postgrespro.ru>,
Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>
Date: 2019-09-03T16:46:13Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Commits
Same data as JSON:
GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits
the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources.
API reference →
-
Don't call data type input functions in GUC check hooks
- 21f428ebde39 12.0 cited
On Tue, Sep 3, 2019 at 7:39 PM Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote: > On Tue, Sep 3, 2019 at 10:05 AM Ibrar Ahmed <ibrar.ahmad@gmail.com> wrote: > > +1 using the library to tar. But I think reason not using tar library is > TAR is > > one of the most simple file format. What is the best/newest format of > TAR? > > So, I don't really want to go down this path at all, as I already > said. You can certainly do your own research on this topic if you > wish. > > I did that and have experience working on the TAR format. I was curious about what "best/newest" you are talking. > -- > Robert Haas > EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com > The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company > -- Ibrar Ahmed