Re: Minimal logical decoding on standbys
Ibrar Ahmed <ibrar.ahmad@gmail.com>
Commits
GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits
the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources.
API reference →
-
Reduce the log level in 035_standby_logical_decoding.pl.
- 3034dc56ef4b 16.0 landed
-
035_standby_logical_decoding: Add missing waits for replication
- 57411c82ce86 16.0 landed
-
For cascading replication, wake physical and logical walsenders separately
- e101dfac3a53 16.0 landed
-
Handle logical slot conflicts on standby
- 26669757b6a7 16.0 landed
-
Support invalidating replication slots due to horizon and wal_level
- be87200efd93 16.0 landed
-
Prevent use of invalidated logical slot in CreateDecodingContext()
- 4397abd0a2af 16.0 landed
-
Replace replication slot's invalidated_at LSN with an enum
- 15f8203a5975 16.0 landed
-
Pass down table relation into more index relation functions
- 61b313e47eb9 16.0 landed
-
Assert only valid flag bits are passed to visibilitymap_set()
- a88a18b1250b 16.0 landed
-
Remove unused _bt_delitems_delete() argument.
- dc43492e46c7 14.0 cited
-
Add xl_btree_delete optimization.
- d2e5e20e5711 13.0 cited
On Mon, Jul 4, 2022 at 6:12 PM Drouvot, Bertrand <bdrouvot@amazon.com> wrote: > Hi, > On 7/1/22 10:03 PM, Ibrar Ahmed wrote: > > > On Thu, Jun 30, 2022 at 1:49 PM Drouvot, Bertrand <bdrouvot@amazon.com> > wrote: > >> I'm going to re-create a CF entry for it, as: >> >> - It seems there is a clear interest for the feature (given the time >> already spend on it and the number of people that worked on) >> >> - I've in mind to resume working on it >> >> I have already done some research on that, I can definitely look at it. > > Thanks! > > This feature proposal is currently made of 5 sub-patches: > > 0001: Add info in WAL records in preparation for logical slot conflict > handling > 0002: Handle logical slot conflicts on standby > 0003: Allow logical decoding on standby. > 0004: New TAP test for logical decoding on standby > 0005: Doc changes describing details about logical decoding > > I suggest that we focus on one sub-patch at a time. > > I'll start with 0001 and come back with a rebase addressing Andres and > Robert's previous comments. > > Sounds good to you? > > Thanks > > -- > Bertrand Drouvot > Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com > > That's great I am looking at "0002: Handle logical slot conflicts on standby". -- Ibrar Ahmed