Re: Making Vars outer-join aware
Ted Yu <yuzhihong@gmail.com>
From: Ted Yu <yuzhihong@gmail.com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>, "Finnerty, Jim" <jfinnert@amazon.com>
Date: 2022-12-23T20:59:07Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Commits
Same data as JSON:
GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits
the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources.
API reference →
-
Re-allow INDEX_VAR as rt_index in ChangeVarNodes().
- fbf80421ead5 16.0 landed
-
Fix thinkos in have_unsafe_outer_join_ref; reduce to Assert check.
- f50f029c497d 16.0 landed
-
Invent "join domains" to replace the below_outer_join hack.
- 3bef56e11650 16.0 landed
-
Do assorted mop-up in the planner.
- b448f1c8d83f 16.0 landed
-
Make Vars be outer-join-aware.
- 2489d76c4906 16.0 landed
-
Invent "multibitmapsets", and use them to speed up antijoin detection.
- e9e26b5e7166 16.0 landed
-
Add basic regression tests for semi/antijoin recognition.
- 0043aa6b8597 16.0 landed
-
Improve performance of adjust_appendrel_attrs_multilevel.
- 2f17b57017e5 16.0 landed
-
Refactor addition of PlaceHolderVars to joinrel targetlists.
- afa0ec30bfd1 16.0 landed
-
Use an explicit state flag to control PlaceHolderInfo creation.
- b3ff6c742f6c 16.0 landed
-
Make PlaceHolderInfo lookup O(1).
- 6569ca43973b 16.0 landed
On Fri, Dec 23, 2022 at 10:21 AM Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > Here's a new edition of this patch series. > > I shoved some preliminary refactoring into the 0001 patch, > notably splitting deconstruct_jointree into two passes. > 0002-0009 cover the same ground as they did before, though > with some differences in detail. 0010-0012 are new work > mostly aimed at removing kluges we no longer need. > > There are two big areas that I would still like to improve, but > I think we've run out of time to address them in the v16 cycle: > > * It'd be nice to apply the regular EquivalenceClass deduction > mechanisms to outer-join equalities, instead of the > reconsider_outer_join_clauses kluge. I've made several stabs at that > without much success. I think that the "join domain" framework added > in 0012 is likely to provide a workable foundation, but some more > effort is needed. > > * I really want to get rid of RestrictInfo.is_pushed_down and > RINFO_IS_PUSHED_DOWN(), because those seem exceedingly awkward > and squishy. I've not gotten far with finding a better > replacement there, either. > > Despite the work being unfinished, I feel that this has moved us a > long way towards outer-join handling being less of a jury-rigged > affair. > > regards, tom lane > > Hi, For v8-0012-invent-join-domains.patch, in `distribute_qual_to_rels`, it seems that `pseudoconstant` and `root->hasPseudoConstantQuals` carry the same value. Can the variable `pseudoconstant` be omitted ? Cheers