Re: add timing information to pg_upgrade
Bharath Rupireddy <bharath.rupireddyforpostgres@gmail.com>
From: Bharath Rupireddy <bharath.rupireddyforpostgres@gmail.com>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter@eisentraut.org>
Cc: Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart@gmail.com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2023-08-02T07:32:53Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Aug 2, 2023 at 12:45 PM Peter Eisentraut <peter@eisentraut.org> wrote: > > On 01.08.23 17:45, Nathan Bossart wrote: > > The message is too long, so there's no space between it and the "ok" > > message: > > > > Checking for incompatible "aclitem" data type in user tablesok > > > > Instead of altering the messages, we could bump MESSAGE_WIDTH from 60 to > > 62 or 64. Do you prefer that approach? > > I think we should change the output format to be more like initdb, like > > Doing something ... ok > > without horizontally aligning all the "ok"s. While this looks simple, we might end up with a lot of diff and changes after removing MESSAGE_WIDTH. There's a significant part of pg_upgrade code that deals with MESSAGE_WIDTH. I don't think it's worth the effort. Therefore, I'd prefer the simplest possible fix - change the message to '"Checking for \"aclitem\" data type in user tables". It may be an overkill, but we can consider adding Assert(sizeof(message) < MESSAGE_WIDTH) in progress report functions to not encourage new messages to end up in the same formatting issue. -- Bharath Rupireddy PostgreSQL Contributors Team RDS Open Source Databases Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com
Commits
-
pg_upgrade: Bump MESSAGE_WIDTH.
- 2e7d15ab69d9 16.0 landed
- 9625845532ae 17.0 landed