Re: pg_walinspect - a new extension to get raw WAL data and WAL stats
Bharath Rupireddy <bharath.rupireddyforpostgres@gmail.com>
From: Bharath Rupireddy <bharath.rupireddyforpostgres@gmail.com>
To: Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>, Greg Stark <stark@mit.edu>, Jeremy Schneider <schneider@ardentperf.com>,
Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>, SATYANARAYANA NARLAPURAM <satyanarlapuram@gmail.com>, marvin_liang@qq.com,
actyzhang@outlook.com, Ashutosh Sharma <ashu.coek88@gmail.com>
Date: 2022-02-12T11:33:08Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Feb 10, 2022 at 9:55 PM Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie> wrote: > > On Sun, Feb 6, 2022 at 7:45 AM Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote: > > For what it's worth, I am generally in favor of having something like > > this in PostgreSQL. I think it's wrong of us to continue assuming that > > everyone has command-line access. Even when that's true, it's not > > necessarily convenient. If you choose to use a relational database, > > you may be the sort of person who likes SQL. And if you are, you may > > want to have the database tell you what's going on via SQL rather than > > command-line tools or operating system utilities. Imagine if we didn't > > have pg_stat_activity and you had to get that information by running a > > separate binary. Would anyone like that? Why is this case any > > different? > > +1. An SQL interface is significantly easier to work with. Especially > because it can use the built-in LSN type, pg_lsn. > > I don't find the slippery slope argument convincing. There aren't that > many other things that are like pg_waldump, but haven't already been > exposed via an SQL interface. Offhand, I can't think of any. On Sat, Feb 12, 2022 at 4:03 AM Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> wrote: > > Almost completely off topic, but this reminded me of an incident about > 30 years ago at my first gig as an SA/DBA. There was an application > programmer who insisted on loading a set of values from a text file into > a temp table (it was Ingres, anyone remember that?). Why? Because he > knew how to write "Select * from mytable order by mycol" but didn't know > how to drive the Unix sort utility at the command line. When I was > unable to restrain myself from smiling at this he got very angry and > yelled at me loudly. > > So, yes, some people do like SQL and hate the command line. Thanks a lot for the comments. I'm looking forward to the review of the latest v4 patches posted at [1]. [1] https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CALj2ACUS9%2B54QGPtUjk76dcYW-AMKp3hPe-U%2BpQo2-GpE4kjtA%40mail.gmail.com Regards, Bharath Rupireddy.
Commits
-
Doc build fix: remove tab from filelist.sgml.
- 8638c76cc9f4 15.0 landed
-
Add contrib/pg_walinspect.
- 2258e76f90bf 15.0 landed
-
Simplify SRFs using materialize mode in contrib/ modules
- 5b81703787bf 15.0 cited
-
Invent "trusted" extensions, and remove the pg_pltemplate catalog.
- 50fc694e4374 13.0 cited