Re: Printing backtrace of postgres processes

Bharath Rupireddy <bharath.rupireddyforpostgres@gmail.com>

From: Bharath Rupireddy <bharath.rupireddyforpostgres@gmail.com>
To: vignesh C <vignesh21@gmail.com>
Cc: Justin Pryzby <pryzby@telsasoft.com>, Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut@gmail.com>, Daniel Gustafsson <daniel@yesql.se>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>, Craig Ringer <craig.ringer@enterprisedb.com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@enterprisedb.com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>
Date: 2021-11-20T06:20:24Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Fri, Nov 19, 2021 at 4:07 PM vignesh C <vignesh21@gmail.com> wrote:
> The Attached v15 patch has the fixes for the same.

Thanks. The v15 patch LGTM and the cf bot is happy hence marking it as RfC.

Regards,
Bharath Rupireddy.



Commits

  1. Perform apply of large transactions by parallel workers.

  2. Enhance pg_log_backend_memory_contexts() for auxiliary processes.

  3. Allow GRANT on pg_log_backend_memory_contexts().

  4. Move Perl test modules to a better namespace

  5. Unify PostgresNode's new() and get_new_node() methods

  6. Add backtrace support for error reporting