Re: Introduce XID age and inactive timeout based replication slot invalidation
Bharath Rupireddy <bharath.rupireddyforpostgres@gmail.com>
Commits
GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits
the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources.
API reference →
-
Add a test for commit ac0e33136a using the injection point.
- 8a695d7998be 18.0 landed
-
Invalidate inactive replication slots.
- ac0e33136abc 18.0 landed
-
Fix incorrect slot type in BuildTupleHashTableExt
- d96d1d5152f3 18.0 cited
-
Allow synced slots to have their inactive_since.
- 6f132ed693b6 17.0 landed
-
Change last_inactive_time to inactive_since in pg_replication_slots.
- 6d49c8d4b4f4 17.0 landed
-
Track last_inactive_time in pg_replication_slots.
- a11f330b5584 17.0 landed
-
Track invalidation_reason in pg_replication_slots.
- 6ae701b4378d 17.0 landed
-
Add option force_initdb to PostgreSQL::Test::Cluster:init()
- ff9e1e764fcc 17.0 cited
-
Add a failover option to subscriptions.
- 776621a5e479 17.0 cited
-
Allow setting failover property in the replication command.
- 73292404370c 17.0 cited
-
Allow to enable failover property for replication slots via SQL API.
- c393308b69d2 17.0 cited
-
Track conflict_reason in pg_replication_slots.
- 007693f2a3ac 17.0 cited
-
Log messages for replication slot acquisition and release.
- 7c3fb505b14e 17.0 cited
-
Remove vacuum_defer_cleanup_age
- 1118cd37eb61 16.0 cited
-
Fix corruption due to vacuum_defer_cleanup_age underflowing 64bit xids
- be504a3e974d 16.0 cited
-
meson: Add initial version of meson based build system
- e6927270cd18 16.0 cited
On Wed, Mar 6, 2024 at 4:28 PM Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote: > > IIUC, the current conflict_reason is primarily used to determine > logical slots on standby that got invalidated due to recovery time > conflict. On the primary, it will also show logical slots that got > invalidated due to the corresponding WAL got removed. Is that > understanding correct? That's right. > If so, we are already sort of overloading this > column. However, now adding more invalidation reasons that won't > happen during recovery conflict handling will change entirely the > purpose (as per the name we use) of this variable. I think > invalidation_reason could depict this column correctly but OTOH I > guess it would lose its original meaning/purpose. Hm. I get the concern. Are you okay with having inavlidation_reason separately for both logical and physical slots? In such a case, logical slots that got invalidated on the standby will have duplicate info in conflict_reason and invalidation_reason, is this fine? Another idea is to make 'conflict_reason text' as a 'conflicting boolean' again (revert 007693f2a3), and have 'invalidation_reason text' for both logical and physical slots. So, whenever 'conflicting' is true, one can look at invalidation_reason for the reason for conflict. How does this sound? -- Bharath Rupireddy PostgreSQL Contributors Team RDS Open Source Databases Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com