Re: Introduce XID age and inactive timeout based replication slot invalidation
Bharath Rupireddy <bharath.rupireddyforpostgres@gmail.com>
Commits
GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits
the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources.
API reference →
-
Add a test for commit ac0e33136a using the injection point.
- 8a695d7998be 18.0 landed
-
Invalidate inactive replication slots.
- ac0e33136abc 18.0 landed
-
Fix incorrect slot type in BuildTupleHashTableExt
- d96d1d5152f3 18.0 cited
-
Allow synced slots to have their inactive_since.
- 6f132ed693b6 17.0 landed
-
Change last_inactive_time to inactive_since in pg_replication_slots.
- 6d49c8d4b4f4 17.0 landed
-
Track last_inactive_time in pg_replication_slots.
- a11f330b5584 17.0 landed
-
Track invalidation_reason in pg_replication_slots.
- 6ae701b4378d 17.0 landed
-
Add option force_initdb to PostgreSQL::Test::Cluster:init()
- ff9e1e764fcc 17.0 cited
-
Add a failover option to subscriptions.
- 776621a5e479 17.0 cited
-
Allow setting failover property in the replication command.
- 73292404370c 17.0 cited
-
Allow to enable failover property for replication slots via SQL API.
- c393308b69d2 17.0 cited
-
Track conflict_reason in pg_replication_slots.
- 007693f2a3ac 17.0 cited
-
Log messages for replication slot acquisition and release.
- 7c3fb505b14e 17.0 cited
-
Remove vacuum_defer_cleanup_age
- 1118cd37eb61 16.0 cited
-
Fix corruption due to vacuum_defer_cleanup_age underflowing 64bit xids
- be504a3e974d 16.0 cited
-
meson: Add initial version of meson based build system
- e6927270cd18 16.0 cited
Attachments
- v9-0001-Track-invalidation_reason-in-pg_replication_slots.patch (application/x-patch) patch v9-0001
- v9-0002-Add-XID-age-based-replication-slot-invalidation.patch (application/x-patch) patch v9-0002
- v9-0003-Track-inactive-replication-slot-information.patch (application/x-patch) patch v9-0003
- v9-0004-Add-inactive_timeout-based-replication-slot-inval.patch (application/x-patch) patch v9-0004
On Thu, Mar 14, 2024 at 12:24 PM Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Wed, Mar 13, 2024 at 9:24 PM Bharath Rupireddy > > > > Yes, there will be some sort of duplicity if we emit conflict_reason > > as a text field. However, I still think the better way is to turn > > conflict_reason text to conflict boolean and set it to true only on > > rows_removed and wal_level_insufficient invalidations. When conflict > > boolean is true, one (including all the tests that we've added > > recently) can look for invalidation_reason text field for the reason. > > This sounds reasonable to me as opposed to we just mentioning in the > > docs that "if invalidation_reason is rows_removed or > > wal_level_insufficient it's the reason for conflict with recovery". > > > Fair point. I think we can go either way. Bertrand, Nathan, and > others, do you have an opinion on this matter? While we wait to hear from others on this, I'm attaching the v9 patch set implementing the above idea (check 0001 patch). Please have a look. I'll come back to the other review comments soon. -- Bharath Rupireddy PostgreSQL Contributors Team RDS Open Source Databases Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com