Re: Introduce XID age based replication slot invalidation
Bharath Rupireddy <bharath.rupireddyforpostgres@gmail.com>
From: Bharath Rupireddy <bharath.rupireddyforpostgres@gmail.com>
To: Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com>
Cc: Srinath Reddy Sadipiralla <srinath2133@gmail.com>, SATYANARAYANA NARLAPURAM <satyanarlapuram@gmail.com>, "Hayato Kuroda (Fujitsu)" <kuroda.hayato@fujitsu.com>,
John H <johnhyvr@gmail.com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2026-04-06T02:52:07Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Hi, On Sun, Apr 5, 2026 at 1:03 AM Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com> wrote: > > Thank you for updating the patch! > > I've made some changes including moving MaybeInvalidateXidAgedSlot() > to vacuum.c since the function seems more inherently tied to vacuum > context. Also, updated the commit message and fixed typos. > > Please review the attached patch. Thank you Sawada-san! I took a look at the v10 patch and it LGTM. I tested it - make check-world passes, pgindent doesn't complain. -- Bharath Rupireddy Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com
Commits
Same data as JSON:
GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits
the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources.
API reference →
-
Fix the handling of two GUCs during upgrade.
- 72e6c08fea7c 19 (unreleased) cited