Re: Introduce XID age and inactive timeout based replication slot invalidation
Bharath Rupireddy <bharath.rupireddyforpostgres@gmail.com>
Commits
GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits
the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources.
API reference →
-
Add a test for commit ac0e33136a using the injection point.
- 8a695d7998be 18.0 landed
-
Invalidate inactive replication slots.
- ac0e33136abc 18.0 landed
-
Fix incorrect slot type in BuildTupleHashTableExt
- d96d1d5152f3 18.0 cited
-
Allow synced slots to have their inactive_since.
- 6f132ed693b6 17.0 landed
-
Change last_inactive_time to inactive_since in pg_replication_slots.
- 6d49c8d4b4f4 17.0 landed
-
Track last_inactive_time in pg_replication_slots.
- a11f330b5584 17.0 landed
-
Track invalidation_reason in pg_replication_slots.
- 6ae701b4378d 17.0 landed
-
Add option force_initdb to PostgreSQL::Test::Cluster:init()
- ff9e1e764fcc 17.0 cited
-
Add a failover option to subscriptions.
- 776621a5e479 17.0 cited
-
Allow setting failover property in the replication command.
- 73292404370c 17.0 cited
-
Allow to enable failover property for replication slots via SQL API.
- c393308b69d2 17.0 cited
-
Track conflict_reason in pg_replication_slots.
- 007693f2a3ac 17.0 cited
-
Log messages for replication slot acquisition and release.
- 7c3fb505b14e 17.0 cited
-
Remove vacuum_defer_cleanup_age
- 1118cd37eb61 16.0 cited
-
Fix corruption due to vacuum_defer_cleanup_age underflowing 64bit xids
- be504a3e974d 16.0 cited
-
meson: Add initial version of meson based build system
- e6927270cd18 16.0 cited
Attachments
- v24-0001-Use-less-confusing-name-for-slot-s-last_inactive.patch (application/octet-stream) patch v24-0001
- v24-0002-Maintain-inactive_since-for-synced-slots-correct.patch (application/octet-stream) patch v24-0002
- v24-0003-Allow-setting-inactive_timeout-for-replication-s.patch (application/octet-stream) patch v24-0003
- v24-0004-Add-inactive_timeout-based-replication-slot-inva.patch (application/octet-stream) patch v24-0004
On Tue, Mar 26, 2024 at 4:35 PM Bharath Rupireddy <bharath.rupireddyforpostgres@gmail.com> wrote: > > If we just sync inactive_since value for synced slots while in > recovery from the primary, so be it. Why do we need to update it to > the current time when the slot is being created? We don't expose slot > creation time, no? Aren't we fine if we just sync the value from > primary and document that fact? After the promotion, we can reset it > to the current time so that it gets its own time. I'm attaching v24 patches. It implements the above idea proposed upthread for synced slots. I've now separated s/last_inactive_time/inactive_since and synced slots behaviour. Please have a look. -- Bharath Rupireddy PostgreSQL Contributors Team RDS Open Source Databases Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com