Re: Should we rename amapi.h and amapi.c?

On Sun, Dec 22, 2019 at 9:34 PM Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> I was working on some stuff for table AMs, and I got to wonder it we
> had better rename amapi.h to indexam.h and amapi.c to indexam.c, so as
> things are more consistent with table AM.  It is a bit annoying to
> name the files dedicated to index AMs with what looks like now a too
> generic name.  That would require switching a couple of header files
> for existing module developers, which is always annoying, but the move
> makes sense thinking long-term?
>
> Any thoughts?
>

I had raised the same earlier and [1] has response from Andres, which was
"We probably should rename it, but not in 12..."

[1]
https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/20190508215135.4eljnhnle5xp3jwb%40alap3.anarazel.de