Re: Calling PrepareTempTablespaces in BufFileCreateTemp

On Thu, Apr 25, 2019 at 9:45 AM Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:

> However, by that argument we should change all 3 of these functions to
> set up the data.  If we're eating the layering violation to the extent
> of letting OpenTemporaryFile call into commands/tablespace, then there's
> little reason for the other 2 not to do likewise.
>

I agree to that point, same logic should be used for all three calls
irrespective of the approach we pick.

I still remain concerned that invoking catalog lookups from fd.c is a darn
> bad idea, even if we have a fallback for it to work (for some value of
> "work") in non-transactional states.  It's not really hard to envision
> that kind of thing leading to infinite recursion.  I think it's safe
> right now, because catalog fetches shouldn't lead to any temp-file
> access, but that's sort of a rickety assumption isn't it?
>

Is there (easy) way to assert for that assumption? If yes, then can add the
same and make it not rickety.

Though I agree any exceptions/violations coded generally bites in long run
somewhere later.