Re: eliminate xl_heap_visible to reduce WAL (and eventually set VM on-access)
Kirill Reshke <reshkekirill@gmail.com>
Commits
GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits
the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources.
API reference →
-
Remove table_scan_analyze_next_tuple unneeded parameter OldestXmin
- 284925508ae6 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Simplify visibility check in heap_page_would_be_all_visible()
- 3efe58febc3c 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Eliminate use of cached VM value in lazy_scan_prune()
- 648a7e28d7c2 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Combine visibilitymap_set() cases in lazy_scan_prune()
- 21796c267d0a 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Fix const qualification in prune_freeze_setup()
- 4877391ce894 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Simplify vacuum visibility assertion
- bd298f54a0d6 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Split heap_page_prune_and_freeze() into helpers
- e135e044572e 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Assert that cutoffs are provided if freezing will be attempted
- cd38b7e77315 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Split PruneFreezeParams initializers to one field per line
- 1e14edcea5e1 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Refactor heap_page_prune_and_freeze() parameters into a struct
- 1937ed70621e 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Make heap_page_is_all_visible independent of LVRelState
- 3e4705484e0c 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Inline TransactionIdFollows/Precedes[OrEquals]()
- 43b05b38ea4d 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Add helper for freeze determination to heap_page_prune_and_freeze
- c8dd6542bae4 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Bump XLOG_PAGE_MAGIC after xl_heap_prune change
- 4a8fb58671d3 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Correct prune WAL record opcode name in comment
- ae8ea7278c16 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Add error codes when vacuum discovers VM corruption
- 8ec97e78a771 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Remove unused xl_heap_prune member, reason
- 4b5f206de2bb 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Remove unneeded VM pin from VM replay
- 3399c265543e 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Add assert and log message to visibilitymap_set
- e3d5ddb7ca91 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Add error codes to some corruption log messages
- fd6ec93bf890 13.0 cited
Attachments
- attach.txt (text/plain)
On Sat, 2 Aug 2025 at 02:36, Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jul 31, 2025 at 6:58 PM Melanie Plageman
> <melanieplageman@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > The patch "Set-pd_prune_xid-on-insert.txt" can be applied as the last
> > patch in the set. It sets pd_prune_xid on insert (so pages filled by
> > COPY or insert can also be set all-visible in the VM before they are
> > vacuumed). I gave it a .txt extension because it currently fails
> > 035_standby_logical_decoding due to a recovery conflict. I need to
> > investigate more to see if this is a bug in my patch set or elsewhere
> > in Postgres.
>
> I figured out that if we set the VM on-access, we need to enable
> hot_standby_feedback in more places in 035_standby_logical_decoding.pl
> to avoid recovery conflicts. I've done that in the attached updated
> version 6. There are a few other issues in
> 035_standby_logical_decoding.pl that I reported here [1]. With these
> changes, setting pd_prune_xid on insert passes tests. Whether or not
> we want to do it (and what the heuristic should be for deciding when
> to do it) is another question.
>
> - Melanie
>
> [1] https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/CAAKRu_YO2mEm%3DZWZKPjTMU%3DgW5Y83_KMi_1cr51JwavH0ctd7w%40mail.gmail.com
v6-0015:
I chose to verify whether this single modification would be beneficial
on the HEAD.
Benchmark I did:
```
\timing
CREATE TABLE zz(i int);
alter table zz set (autovacuum_enabled = false);
TRUNCATE zz;
copy zz from program 'yes 2 | head -n 180000000';
copy zz from program 'yes 2 | head -n 180000000';
delete from zz where (REPLACE(REPLACE(ctid::text, '(', '{'), ')',
'}')::int[])[2] = 7 ;
VACUUM FREEZE zz;
```
And I checked perf top footprint for last statement (vacuum). My
detailed results are attached. It is a HEAD vs HEAD+v6-0015 benchmark.
TLDR: function inlining is indeed beneficial, TransactionIdPrecedes
function disappears from perf top footprint, though query runtime is
not changed much. So, while not resulting in query speedup, this can
save CPU.
Maybe we can derive an artificial benchmark, which will show query
speed up, but for now I dont have one.
--
Best regards,
Kirill Reshke