Re: eliminate xl_heap_visible to reduce WAL (and eventually set VM on-access)
Kirill Reshke <reshkekirill@gmail.com>
Commits
GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits
the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources.
API reference →
-
Remove table_scan_analyze_next_tuple unneeded parameter OldestXmin
- 284925508ae6 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Simplify visibility check in heap_page_would_be_all_visible()
- 3efe58febc3c 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Eliminate use of cached VM value in lazy_scan_prune()
- 648a7e28d7c2 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Combine visibilitymap_set() cases in lazy_scan_prune()
- 21796c267d0a 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Fix const qualification in prune_freeze_setup()
- 4877391ce894 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Simplify vacuum visibility assertion
- bd298f54a0d6 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Split heap_page_prune_and_freeze() into helpers
- e135e044572e 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Assert that cutoffs are provided if freezing will be attempted
- cd38b7e77315 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Split PruneFreezeParams initializers to one field per line
- 1e14edcea5e1 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Refactor heap_page_prune_and_freeze() parameters into a struct
- 1937ed70621e 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Make heap_page_is_all_visible independent of LVRelState
- 3e4705484e0c 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Inline TransactionIdFollows/Precedes[OrEquals]()
- 43b05b38ea4d 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Add helper for freeze determination to heap_page_prune_and_freeze
- c8dd6542bae4 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Bump XLOG_PAGE_MAGIC after xl_heap_prune change
- 4a8fb58671d3 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Correct prune WAL record opcode name in comment
- ae8ea7278c16 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Add error codes when vacuum discovers VM corruption
- 8ec97e78a771 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Remove unused xl_heap_prune member, reason
- 4b5f206de2bb 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Remove unneeded VM pin from VM replay
- 3399c265543e 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Add assert and log message to visibilitymap_set
- e3d5ddb7ca91 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Add error codes to some corruption log messages
- fd6ec93bf890 13.0 cited
On Thu, 28 Aug 2025 at 00:02, Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com> wrote: > > Do we need to pin vmbuffer here? Looks like > > XLogReadBufferForRedoExtended already pins vmbuffer. I verified this > > with CheckBufferIsPinnedOnce(vmbuffer) just before visibilitymap_pin > > and COPY ... WITH (FREEZE true) test. > > I thought the reason visibilitymap_set() did it was that it was > possible for the block of the VM corresponding to the block of the > heap to be different during recovery than it was when emitting the > record, and thus we needed the part of visiblitymap_pin() that > released the old vmbuffer and got the new one corresponding to the > heap block. > > I can't quite think of how this could happen though. > > Assuming it can't happen, then we can get rid of visiblitymap_pin() > (and add visibilitymap_pin_ok()) in both visiblitymap_set_vmbyte() and > visibilitymap_set(). I've done this to visibilitymap_set() in a > separate patch 0001. I would like other opinions/confirmation that the > block of the VM corresponding to the heap block cannot differ during > recovery from that what it was when the record was emitted during > normal operation, though. I did micro git-blame research here. I spotted only one related change [0]. Looks like before this change pin was indeed needed. But not after this change, so this visibilitymap_pin is just an oversight? Related thread is [1]. I quickly checked the discussion in this thread, and it looks like no one was bothered about these lines or VM logging changes (in this exact pin buffer aspect). The discussion was of other aspects of this commit. [0] https://github.com/postgres/postgres/commit/2c03216d8311 [1] https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/533D6CBF.6080203%40vmware.com -- Best regards, Kirill Reshke