Re: Add 64-bit XIDs into PostgreSQL 15
Pavel Borisov <pashkin.elfe@gmail.com>
From: Pavel Borisov <pashkin.elfe@gmail.com>
To: Aleksander Alekseev <aleksander@timescale.com>
Cc: Postgres hackers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>, Justin Pryzby <pryzby@telsasoft.com>, Maxim Orlov <orlovmg@gmail.com>, Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>,
Alexander Korotkov <aekorotkov@gmail.com>, Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>, Ilya Anfimov <ilan@tzirechnoy.com>
Date: 2022-07-18T09:23:42Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Commits
Same data as JSON:
GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits
the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources.
API reference →
-
Add SLRU tests for 64-bit page case
- a60b8a58f435 17.0 landed
-
Make use FullTransactionId in 2PC filenames
- 5a1dfde8334b 17.0 landed
-
Use larger segment file names for pg_notify
- 2cdf131c46e6 17.0 landed
-
Index SLRUs by 64-bit integers rather than by 32-bit integers
- 4ed8f0913bfd 17.0 landed
Attachments
- v43-0001-Use-64-bit-numbering-of-SLRU-pages.patch (application/octet-stream) patch v43-0001
- v43-0005-Add-initdb-option-to-initialize-cluster-with-non.patch (application/octet-stream) patch v43-0005
- v43-0006-README.XID64.patch (application/octet-stream) patch v43-0006
- v43-0007-Use-64-bit-GUCs.patch (application/octet-stream) patch v43-0007
- v43-0004-Use-64-bit-pages-representation-in-SLRU-callers.patch (application/octet-stream) patch v43-0004
- v43-0008-Use-64-bit-XIDs.patch (application/octet-stream) patch v43-0008
- v43-0003-Use-64-bit-FullTransactionId-instead-of-Epoch-xi.patch (application/octet-stream) patch v43-0003
- v43-0002-Use-64-bit-format-to-output-XIDs.patch (application/octet-stream) patch v43-0002
> > > I can agree with you that sending rebased patches too often can be a > little annoying. On the other hand, otherwise, it's just red in Cfbot. I > suppose it's much easier and more comfortable to review the patches that at > least apply cleanly and pass all tests. So if Cfbot is red for a long time > I feel we need to send a rebased patchset anyway. > > > > I'll try to not doing this too often but frankly, I don't see a better > alternative at the moment. > > Considering the overall activity on the mailing list personally I > don't see a problem here. Several extra emails don't bother me at all, > but I would like to see a green cfbot report for an open item in the > CF application. Otherwise someone will complain that the patch doesn't > apply anymore and the result will be the same as for sending an > updated patch, except that we will receive at least two emails instead > of one. > Hi, Alexander! Agree with you. I also consider green cfbot entry important. So PFA rebased v43. -- Best regards, Pavel Borisov