Re: type cache cleanup improvements
Pavel Borisov <pashkin.elfe@gmail.com>
Commits
GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits
the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources.
API reference →
-
Maintain RelIdToTypeIdCacheHash in TypeCacheOpcCallback()
- bb78e4267817 18.0 landed
-
Fix concurrrently in typcache_rel_type_cache.sql
- aa1e898dea66 18.0 landed
-
Avoid looping over all type cache entries in TypeCacheRelCallback()
- b85a9d046efd 18.0 landed
- c14d4acb8134 18.0 landed
-
Update header comment for lookup_type_cache()
- c1500a1ba7e1 18.0 landed
-
Revert: Avoid looping over all type cache entries in TypeCacheRelCallback()
- 8daa62a10c91 18.0 landed
-
Introduce hash_search_with_hash_value() function
- d0f020037e19 18.0 landed
-
Optimize InvalidateAttoptCacheCallback() and TypeCacheTypCallback()
- 40064a8ee1b3 18.0 landed
-
Refactor initial hash lookup in dynahash.c
- cc5ef90edd80 17.0 landed
-
Rationalize and improve error messages for some jsonpath items
- 92d2ab7554f9 17.0 cited
-
Avoid race in RelationBuildDesc() affecting CREATE INDEX CONCURRENTLY.
- fdd965d074d4 15.0 cited
-
Represent Lists as expansible arrays, not chains of cons-cells.
- 1cff1b95ab6d 13.0 cited
Hi, Alexander! On Tue, 22 Oct 2024 at 11:34, Alexander Korotkov <aekorotkov@gmail.com> wrote: > On Mon, Oct 21, 2024 at 2:30 PM Alexander Korotkov <aekorotkov@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > > On Mon, Oct 21, 2024 at 1:16 PM Dagfinn Ilmari Mannsåker > > <ilmari@ilmari.org> wrote: > > > Alexander Korotkov <aekorotkov@gmail.com> writes: > > > > > > > On Mon, Oct 21, 2024 at 8:40 AM Andrei Lepikhov <lepihov@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > >> > > > >> On 21/10/2024 06:32, Dagfinn Ilmari Mannsåker wrote: > > > >> > Alexander Korotkov <aekorotkov@gmail.com> writes: > > > >> > > > > >> >> +static Oid *in_progress_list; > > > >> >> +static int in_progress_list_len; > > > >> >> +static int in_progress_list_maxlen; > > > >> > > > > >> > Is there any particular reason not to use pg_list.h for this? > > > >> Sure. The type cache lookup has to be as much optimal as possible. > > > >> Using an array and relating sequential access to it, we avoid memory > > > >> allocations and deallocations 99.9% of the time. Also, quick access > to > > > >> the single element (which we will have in real life almost all of > the > > > >> time) is much faster than employing list machinery. > > > > > > Lists are actually dynamically resized arrays these days (see commit > > > 1cff1b95ab6ddae32faa3efe0d95a820dbfdc164), not linked lists, so > > > accessing arbitrary elements is O(1), not O(n). Just like this patch, > > > the size is doubled (starting at 16) whenever array is full. > > > > > > > +1, > > > > List with zero elements has to be NIL. That means continuous > > > > allocations/deallocations. > > > > > > This however is a valid point (unless we keep a dummy zeroth element to > > > avoid it, which is even uglier than open-coding the array extension > > > logic), so objection withdrawn. > > > > OK, thank you! > > > > The attached revision fixes EXTRA_INSTALL in > > src/test/modules/typcache/Makefile. Spotted off-list by Arthur > > Zakirov. > > I've re-checked that regression tests pass with > -DCLOBBER_CACHE_ALWAYS. Also did some grammar corrections for > comments and commit message. I'm going to push this if no objections. > Thank you for working on this patch! Looked through the patchset once more. Patch 0001 (minor): "in the last" -> "after everything else" or "after other TypeCacheEntry contents" Patch 0002 looks ready to me. Regards, Pavel Borisov Supabase