Horton

Re: Bogus documentation for bogus geometric operators

Pavel Borisov <pashkin.elfe@gmail.com>

View thread View on postgr.es
From: Pavel Borisov <pashkin.elfe@gmail.com>
To: emre@hasegeli.com
Cc: Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>
Date: 2020-11-04T09:02:52Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Attachments

Emre,

I've rebased and tested your proposed patch. It seems fine and sensible to
me.
I have only one thing to note: as this patch doesn't disable <^ and >^
operator for boxes the existing state of documentation seem consistent to
me:

select '((0,0),(1,1))'::box <<| '((0,1),(1,2))'::box;
----------
 f

select '((0,0),(1,1))'::box <^ '((0,1),(1,2))'::box;
----------
 t

So I've only reverted the changes in the documentation on geometric
functions in your patch.
PFA v3 of your patch. I'd mark it ready to commit if you agree.

Thank you!

-- 
Best regards,
Pavel Borisov

Postgres Professional: http://postgrespro.com <http://www.postgrespro.com>

Commits

  1. Rename the "point is strictly above/below point" comparison operators.

  2. Remove deprecated containment operators for built-in types