Re: Index range search optimization
Pavel Borisov <pashkin.elfe@gmail.com>
From: Pavel Borisov <pashkin.elfe@gmail.com>
To: Alexander Korotkov <aekorotkov@gmail.com>
Cc: Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie>, Konstantin Knizhnik <knizhnik@garret.ru>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2023-09-25T09:58:02Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Attachments
- 0001-Skip-checking-of-scan-keys-required-for-direction-v4.patch (application/octet-stream) patch v4-0001
Hi, Alexander! I found and fixed a couple of naming issues that came to v4 from earlier patches. Also, I added initialization of requiredMatchedByPrecheck in case of first page. Please see patch v5. One more doubt about naming. Calling function _bt_checkkeys(IndexScanDesc scan, IndexTuple tuple, int tupnatts, ScanDirection dir, bool *continuescan, bool requiredMatchedByPrecheck) as (void) _bt_checkkeys(scan, itup, indnatts, dir, &requiredMatchedByPrecheck, false); looks little bit misleading because of coincidence of names of 5 and 6 arguments.
Commits
-
Skip checking of scan keys required for directional scan in B-tree
- e0b1ee17dc3a 17.0 landed
-
Invalidate binary search bounds consistently.
- 74eb2176bf3a 12.0 cited