Re: Unit tests for SLRU
Pavel Borisov <pashkin.elfe@gmail.com>
From: Pavel Borisov <pashkin.elfe@gmail.com>
To: Aleksander Alekseev <aleksander@timescale.com>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>, Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>,
Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@enterprisedb.com>, Maxim Orlov <orlovmg@gmail.com>, Noah Misch <noah@leadboat.com>, Daniel Gustafsson <daniel@yesql.se>
Date: 2022-11-15T10:43:06Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Hi, Alexander! > > I have reworked that as per the attached, that provides basically the > > same coverage, going through a SQL interface for the whole thing. > > Like all the other tests of its kind, this does not use a TAP test, > > relying on a custom configuration file instead. This still needs some > > polishing, but the basics are here. > > Many thanks for the updated patch. I didn't know one can run tests > with a custom postgresql.conf without using TAP tests. > > > What do you think? > > It looks much better than before. I replaced strcpy() with strncpy() > and pgindent'ed the code. Other than that to me it looks ready to be > committed. I've looked through the patch again. I agree it looks better and can be committed. Mark it as RfC now. Regards, Pavel Borisov
Commits
-
Add test module for SLRUs
- 006b69fd912b 16.0 landed
-
Fix comment of SimpleLruInit() in slru.c
- 9e0321135cae 14.7 landed
- 5962c8cbe5a6 15.2 landed
- 5ca3645cb3fb 16.0 landed