Re: OOM in spgist insert

Pavel Borisov <pashkin.elfe@gmail.com>

From: Pavel Borisov <pashkin.elfe@gmail.com>
To: Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut@gmail.com>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>
Date: 2021-05-12T08:51:04Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Attachments

ср, 12 мая 2021 г. в 12:39, Pavel Borisov <pashkin.elfe@gmail.com>:

> ср, 12 мая 2021 г. в 12:36, Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut@gmail.com>:
>
>> On Wed, 12 May 2021 at 1:43 PM, Pavel Borisov <pashkin.elfe@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> ср, 12 мая 2021 г. в 11:09, Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut@gmail.com>:
>>>
>>>> While testing something on spgist I found that at certain point while
>>>> inserting in spgist it is going for doPickSplit, but even after split
>>>> is is not able to find a place to insert a tuple and it keeping going
>>>> in that loop infinitely it seems and finally error out with OOM
>>>> because in this loop we are continuously allocating memory for the
>>>> tuple in temp context but since we are never coming out of the loop it
>>>> is erroring out with OOM.
>>>>
>>>> My first idea is that this is the case when index tuple doesn't fit
>>> into one index page. As INCLUDED columns are added as is the tuple can not
>>> be made shorter by prefix-stripping. Seems we should check every index
>>> tuple length to fit the page before its insertion.
>>>
>>
>> Thanks for looking into this.
>>
>> Will see the code little bit later.
>>>
>>
>> Ok
>>
> PFA v1 patch. Does this help?
>
I've made a mistake in attributes count in v1. PFA v2


-- 
Best regards,
Pavel Borisov

Postgres Professional: http://postgrespro.com <http://www.postgrespro.com>

Commits

  1. Prevent infinite insertion loops in spgdoinsert().

  2. Fix query-cancel handling in spgdoinsert().

  3. Refactor CHECK_FOR_INTERRUPTS() to add flexibility.