Thread
Commits
Same data as JSON:
GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits
the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources.
API reference →
-
postgres_fdw: Add Assert to estimate_path_cost_size().
- 21c9756db645 19 (unreleased) cited
-
Set 1s WaitLatch timeout if standby limit has expired in ResolveRecoveryConflictWithBufferPin
Anthony Hsu <erwaman@gmail.com> — 2025-07-06T18:55:15Z
Hi, I think there is a race scenario where a backend holding a conflicting buffer pin isn't promptly canceled even when the standby limit has expired: 1. suppose there is a buffer pin conflict and standby limit has already expired 2. startup process enters ResolveRecoveryConflictWithBufferPin and broadcasts PROCSIG_RECOVERY_CONFLICT_BUFFERPIN here [A] but does not set any timeouts 3. startup process waits to be signaled by UnpinBuffer() here [B] 4. some non-conflicting backend receives the buffer pin signal sent in (2), checks and sees it is not blocking recovery, and *then* acquires a conflicting buffer pin 5. then the original conflicting backend receives the buffer pin signal sent in (2) and cancels itself, calling UnpinBuffer(). But the pin count will still be > 1 (due to (4) + the pin startup holds), so startup process will not be woken up In this scenario, the startup process might not be woken up for an arbitrarily long length of time. And the new conflicting backend (step (4) above) won't get sent another PROCSIG_RECOVERY_CONFLICT_BUFFERPIN signal telling it to cancel itself. To handle this scenario, I think we should set a timeout when doing WaitLatch if standby limit has already expired. This allows the startup process to wake up in a reasonable time to recheck and send PROCSIG_RECOVERY_CONFLICT_BUFFERPIN again to any new conflicting backends. I have attached a small patch with this proposed fix. Thanks, Anthony [A] https://github.com/postgres/postgres/blob/21c9756db6458f859e6579a6754c78154321cb39/src/backend/storage/ipc/standby.c#L806 [B] https://github.com/postgres/postgres/blob/21c9756db6458f859e6579a6754c78154321cb39/src/backend/storage/ipc/standby.c#L843
-
Re: Set 1s WaitLatch timeout if standby limit has expired in ResolveRecoveryConflictWithBufferPin
Álvaro Herrera <alvherre@kurilemu.de> — 2026-01-30T17:42:27Z
On 2025-Jul-06, Anthony Hsu wrote: > Hi, > > I think there is a race scenario where a backend holding a conflicting > buffer pin isn't promptly canceled even when the standby limit has expired: This patch seems to hav efallen through the cracks. I created a commitfest entry for it, https://commitfest.postgresql.org/patch/6445/ -- Álvaro Herrera PostgreSQL Developer — https://www.EnterpriseDB.com/ "No tengo por qué estar de acuerdo con lo que pienso" (Carlos Caszeli) -
Re: Set 1s WaitLatch timeout if standby limit has expired in ResolveRecoveryConflictWithBufferPin
Anthony Hsu <erwaman@gmail.com> — 2026-02-22T19:20:50Z
Thanks Álvaro for creating a commitfest entry. I've rebased my patch on master to fix the build issues. Also made some minor code comment changes and added a detailed commit message. Please let me know if you have any feedback or questions. -Anthony On Fri, Jan 30, 2026 at 9:42 AM Álvaro Herrera <alvherre@kurilemu.de> wrote: > On 2025-Jul-06, Anthony Hsu wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > I think there is a race scenario where a backend holding a conflicting > > buffer pin isn't promptly canceled even when the standby limit has > expired: > > This patch seems to hav efallen through the cracks. I created a > commitfest entry for it, > https://commitfest.postgresql.org/patch/6445/ > > > > > -- > Álvaro Herrera PostgreSQL Developer — > https://www.EnterpriseDB.com/ > "No tengo por qué estar de acuerdo con lo que pienso" > (Carlos Caszeli) >