Re: pg_upgrade failing for 200+ million Large Objects

Zhihong Yu <zyu@yugabyte.com>

From: Zhihong Yu <zyu@yugabyte.com>
To: Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>
Cc: Jan Wieck <jan@wi3ck.info>, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>, Robins Tharakan <tharakan@gmail.com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@enterprisedb.com>, "pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org" <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2021-03-22T21:36:38Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
>
> Hi,
>
w.r.t. pg_upgrade_improvements.v2.diff.

+       blobBatchCount = 0;
+       blobInXact = false;

The count and bool flag are always reset in tandem. It seems
variable blobInXact is not needed.

Cheers

Commits

Same data as JSON: GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources. API reference →
  1. Count individual SQL commands in pg_restore's --transaction-size mode.

  2. Reduce number of commands dumpTableSchema emits for binary upgrade.

  3. Invent --transaction-size option for pg_restore.

  4. Rearrange pg_dump's handling of large objects for better efficiency.

  5. Add temporal PRIMARY KEY and UNIQUE constraints

  6. Fix typo and case in messages