Re: ExecRTCheckPerms() and many prunable partitions
Zhihong Yu <zyu@yugabyte.com>
From: Zhihong Yu <zyu@yugabyte.com>
To: Amit Langote <amitlangote09@gmail.com>
Cc: Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123@gmail.com>,
Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>,
PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>
Date: 2022-01-17T15:45:06Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Mon, Jan 17, 2022 at 3:51 AM Amit Langote <amitlangote09@gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, Jan 13, 2022 at 3:39 PM Amit Langote <amitlangote09@gmail.com> > wrote: > > On Thu, Jan 13, 2022 at 12:10 PM Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > On Mon, Dec 20, 2021 at 04:13:04PM +0900, Amit Langote wrote: > > > > Patch 0002 needed a rebase, because a conflicting change to > > > > expected/rules.out has since been committed. > > > > > > The cfbot reports new conflicts since about a week ago with this patch: > > > Could you send a rebased patch? In the meantime I'll switch the cf > entry to > > > Waiting on Author. > > > > Turns out I had never compiled this patch set to exercise xml and lz4 > > tests, whose output files contained view definitions shown using \d > > that also needed to be updated in the 0002 patch. > > > > Fixed in the attached updated version. > > cfbot tells me it found a conflict when applying v7 on the latest > HEAD. Fixed in the attached v8. > > Hi, For patch 02, in the description: present for locking views during execition Typo: execution. + * to be used by the executor to lock the view relation and for the + * planner to be able to record the view relation OID in the PlannedStmt + * that it produces for the query. I think the sentence about executor can be placed after the sentence for the planner. For patch 01, GetRelPermissionInfo(): + return perminfo; + } + else keyword 'else' is not needed - the else block can be left-indented. Cheers
Commits
-
Add a test case for a316a3bc
- 054ff3b33a85 17.0 landed
- 0a14bca662a4 16.0 landed
-
Correctly set userid of subquery relations' child rels
- a316a3bc6d3f 16.0 landed
-
Fix buggy recursion in flatten_rtes_walker().
- c7468c73f7b6 16.0 landed
-
Remove some dead code in selfuncs.c
- 438e6b724090 16.0 landed
-
Update outdated comment in ApplyRetrieveRule
- 29861e228a47 16.0 landed
-
Rework query relation permission checking
- a61b1f74823c 16.0 landed
-
Generalize ri_RootToPartitionMap to use for non-partition children
- fb958b5da86d 16.0 landed
-
Stop accessing checkAsUser via RTE in some cases
- 599b33b9492d 16.0 landed
-
Add 'missing_ok' argument to build_attrmap_by_name
- ad86d159b6ab 16.0 landed