Re: Logical Replication of sequences
vignesh C <vignesh21@gmail.com>
Commits
GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits
the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources.
API reference →
-
Doc: Add documentation for sequence synchronization.
- 55cefadde874 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Remove unused assignment in CREATE PUBLICATION grammar.
- bfb7419b0bbe 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Add seq_sync_error_count to subscription statistics.
- f6a4c498dcf6 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Fix few issues in commit 5509055d69.
- 5a4eba558aa7 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Add sequence synchronization for logical replication.
- 5509055d6956 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Add worker type argument to logical replication worker functions.
- 3e8e05596a02 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Introduce "REFRESH SEQUENCES" for subscriptions.
- f0b3573c3aac 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Refactor logical worker synchronization code into a separate file.
- 41c674d2e31e 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Standardize use of REFRESH PUBLICATION in code and messages.
- 2436b8c047ff 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Add "ALL SEQUENCES" support to publications.
- 96b378497346 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Expose sequence page LSN via pg_get_sequence_data.
- b93172ca59f4 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Resume conflict-relevant data retention automatically.
- 0d48d393d465 19 (unreleased) cited
-
Post-commit review fixes for 228c370868.
- 1f7e9ba3ac4e 19 (unreleased) cited
-
Generate GUC tables from .dat file
- 63599896545c 19 (unreleased) cited
Attachments
- v20250424-0001-Introduce-pg_sequence_state-function-for-e.patch (application/octet-stream) patch v20250424-0001
- v20250424-0004-Enhance-sequence-synchronization-during-su.patch (application/octet-stream) patch v20250424-0004
- v20250424-0003-Reorganize-tablesync-Code-and-Introduce-sy.patch (application/octet-stream) patch v20250424-0003
- v20250424-0002-Introduce-ALL-SEQUENCES-support-for-Postgr.patch (application/octet-stream) patch v20250424-0002
- v20250424-0005-Documentation-for-sequence-synchronization.patch (application/octet-stream) patch v20250424-0005
On Thu, 24 Apr 2025 at 05:07, Peter Smith <smithpb2250@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi Vignesh, > > Some review comments for patch v20250422-0003. > > ====== > src/backend/replication/logical/syncutils.c > > 1. > +/* > + * Exit routine for synchronization worker. > + */ > +pg_noreturn void > +SyncFinishWorker(void) > > Why does this have the pg_noreturn annotation? None of the other void > functions do. It indicates that the function will not return control flow to the calling function after it finishes. This is not a new function, it was just moved from tablesync.c > ====== > src/include/replication/worker_internal.h > > 4. > @@ -250,6 +252,7 @@ extern void logicalrep_worker_stop(Oid subid, Oid relid); > extern void logicalrep_pa_worker_stop(ParallelApplyWorkerInfo *winfo); > extern void logicalrep_worker_wakeup(Oid subid, Oid relid); > extern void logicalrep_worker_wakeup_ptr(LogicalRepWorker *worker); > +pg_noreturn extern void SyncFinishWorker(void); > > extern int logicalrep_sync_worker_count(Oid subid); > > @@ -259,9 +262,13 @@ extern void > ReplicationOriginNameForLogicalRep(Oid suboid, Oid relid, > extern bool AllTablesyncsReady(void); > extern void UpdateTwoPhaseState(Oid suboid, char new_state); > > -extern void process_syncing_tables(XLogRecPtr current_lsn); > -extern void invalidate_syncing_table_states(Datum arg, int cacheid, > - uint32 hashvalue); > +extern bool FetchRelationStates(bool *started_tx); > +extern bool WaitForRelationStateChange(Oid relid, char expected_state); > +extern void ProcessSyncingTablesForSync(XLogRecPtr current_lsn); > +extern void ProcessSyncingTablesForApply(XLogRecPtr current_lsn); > +extern void SyncProcessRelations(XLogRecPtr current_lsn); > +extern void SyncInvalidateRelationStates(Datum arg, int cacheid, > + uint32 hashvalue); > > ~ > > 4a. > Why does SyncFinishWorker have the pg_noreturn annotation? None of the > other void functions do. This is same as comment #1 The rest of the comments were fixed. Also the comments from [1] and [2] are fixed in the attached v20250424 version. [1] - https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAHut%2BPticXRg4_W%3Dd7H37DWPh5LNePbcQ5RKc3vUW5HCzAX_fg%40mail.gmail.com [2] - https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAHut%2BPtBhb89%2B1DAYUFc%3D1Ojkh1mHro%2Bg3UCqMZAQoSpPQoqZA%40mail.gmail.com Regards, Vignesh