Re: [DOCS] Stats views and functions not in order?
vignesh C <vignesh21@gmail.com>
From: vignesh C <vignesh21@gmail.com>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@enterprisedb.com>
Cc: Peter Smith <smithpb2250@gmail.com>,
"David G. Johnston" <david.g.johnston@gmail.com>, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>,
PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>
Date: 2023-01-04T07:07:59Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Mon, 2 Jan 2023 at 13:47, Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@enterprisedb.com> wrote: > > On 08.12.22 03:30, Peter Smith wrote: > > PSA patches for v9* > > > > v9-0001 - Now the table rows are ordered per PeterE's suggestions [1] > > committed > > > v9-0002 - All the review comments from DavidJ [2] are addressed > > I'm not sure about this one. It removes the "see [link] for details" > phrases and instead makes the view name a link. I think this loses the > cue that there is more information elsewhere. Otherwise, one could > think that, say, the entry about pg_stat_activity is the primary source > and the link just links to itself. Also keep in mind that people use > media where links are not that apparent (PDF), so the presence of a link > by itself cannot be the only cue about the flow of the information. I'm not sure if anything is pending for v9-0003, if there is something pending, please post an updated patch for the same. Regards, Vignesh
Commits
-
doc: Re-order Table 28.2 "Collected Statistics Views"
- 72e0ff2677c4 16.0 landed
-
doc: Re-order Table 28.35 "Per-Backend Statistics Functions"
- b1d0158060f3 16.0 landed
-
doc: Re-order Table 28.12 "Wait Events of type LWLock"
- 9c558b94f0ca 16.0 landed
-
doc: Re-order sections of "28.4. Progress Reporting"
- 6573643501e9 16.0 landed