Re: Printing backtrace of postgres processes

vignesh C <vignesh21@gmail.com>

From: vignesh C <vignesh21@gmail.com>

To: Daniel Gustafsson <daniel@yesql.se>

Cc: Bharath Rupireddy <bharath.rupireddyforpostgres@gmail.com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>, Craig Ringer <craig.ringer@enterprisedb.com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@enterprisedb.com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>

Date: 2021-11-09T11:15:36Z

Lists: pgsql-hackers

Attachments

v9-0001-Print-backtrace-of-specified-postgres-process.patch (text/x-patch) patch v9-0001

On Thu, Nov 4, 2021 at 4:06 PM Daniel Gustafsson <daniel@yesql.se> wrote:
>
> > On 26 Aug 2021, at 16:56, vignesh C <vignesh21@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > The previous patch was failing because of the recent test changes made
> > by commit 201a76183e2 which unified new and get_new_node, attached
> > patch has the changes to handle the changes accordingly.
>
> This patch now fails because of the test changes made by commit b3b4d8e68a,
> please submit a rebase.

Thanks for reporting this, the attached v9 patch has the changes for the same.

Regards,
Vignesh

Commits

Perform apply of large transactions by parallel workers.
- 216a784829c2 16.0 cited
Enhance pg_log_backend_memory_contexts() for auxiliary processes.
- 790fbda90209 15.0 cited
Allow GRANT on pg_log_backend_memory_contexts().
- f0b051e322d5 15.0 cited
Move Perl test modules to a better namespace
- b3b4d8e68ae8 15.0 cited
Unify PostgresNode's new() and get_new_node() methods
- 201a76183e20 15.0 cited
Add backtrace support for error reporting
- 71a8a4f6e365 13.0 cited