Re: Support logical replication of DDLs

vignesh C <vignesh21@gmail.com>

From: vignesh C <vignesh21@gmail.com>
To: Zheng Li <zhengli10@gmail.com>
Cc: Ajin Cherian <itsajin@gmail.com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>, "houzj.fnst@fujitsu.com" <houzj.fnst@fujitsu.com>, Peter Smith <smithpb2250@gmail.com>, Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>, Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com>, Japin Li <japinli@hotmail.com>, Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut@gmail.com>, rajesh singarapu <rajesh.rs0541@gmail.com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>
Date: 2022-10-07T05:07:20Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Commits

Same data as JSON: GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources. API reference →
  1. Add a run_as_owner option to subscriptions.

  2. Refactor pgoutput_change().

  3. Print the correct aliases for DML target tables in ruleutils.

  4. Fix object identity string for transforms

  5. Add grantable MAINTAIN privilege and pg_maintain role.

  6. Get rid of recursion-marker values in enum AlterTableType

  7. Release cache tuple when no longer needed

  8. Empty search_path in logical replication apply worker and walsender.

  9. Refactor format_type APIs to be more modular

  10. Use wrappers of PG_DETOAST_DATUM_PACKED() more.

Attachments

On Fri, 7 Oct 2022 at 08:10, Zheng Li <zhengli10@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Thanks for the new patch-set.
> > Could you add the changes to patch 1 and patch 2, rather than adding a
> > new patch?
> > Otherwise, we'll have a separate patch for each command and it will
> > take double work to keep it updated
> > for each new command added.
>
> OK. Here is the consolidated patch set. TEXT SEARCH and TRANSFORM
> commands are consolidated into patch 1 and patch 2.
> I was wondering if keeping the changes for each command separate makes
> it easier to review. Maybe just for some commands that need special
> handling.

I agree, let's keep the changes for the commands in patch 1 and patch
2 if we are following the same parsing mechanism that is being
followed for the existing commands. If any command needs to be handled
in a more complex manner which is different from the existing parsing
mechanism then we can think of keeping it in a separate patch.

CFBOT at [1] was failing as some additional changes were required to
handle the meson build errors and warnings. The attached patch has the
changes for the same.
[1] - https://cirrus-ci.com/task/5343002330660864

Regards,
Vignesh