Re: Replication slot stats misgivings
vignesh C <vignesh21@gmail.com>
From: vignesh C <vignesh21@gmail.com>
To: Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>
Cc: Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com>,
Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>, Kyotaro HORIGUCHI <horiguchi.kyotaro@lab.ntt.co.jp>
Date: 2021-04-27T04:18:04Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Apr 27, 2021 at 9:43 AM Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Tue, Apr 27, 2021 at 9:17 AM Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > On Tue, Apr 27, 2021 at 11:31 AM vignesh C <vignesh21@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > And I think there is > > > > > also a risk to increase shared memory when we want to add other > > > > > statistics in the future. > > > > > > > > > > > > > Yeah, so do you think it is not a good idea to store stats in > > > > ReplicationSlot? Actually storing them in a slot makes it easier to > > > > send them during ReplicationSlotRelease which is quite helpful if the > > > > replication is interrupted due to some reason. Or the other idea was > > > > that we send stats every time we stream or spill changes. > > > > > > We use around 64 bytes of shared memory to store the statistics > > > information per slot, I'm not sure if this is a lot of memory. If this > > > memory is fine, then I felt the approach to store stats seems fine. If > > > that memory is too much then we could use the other approach to update > > > stats when we stream or spill the changes as suggested by Amit. > > > > I agree that makes it easier to send slot stats during > > ReplicationSlotRelease() but I'd prefer to avoid storing data that > > doesn't need to be shared in the shared buffer if possible. > > > > Sounds reasonable and we might add some stats in the future so that > will further increase the usage of shared memory. > > > And those > > counters are not used by physical slots at all. If sending slot stats > > every time we stream or spill changes doesn't affect the system much, > > I think it's better than having slot stats in the shared memory. > > > > As the minimum size of logical_decoding_work_mem is 64KB, so in the > worst case, we will send stats after decoding that many changes. I > don't think it would impact too much considering that we need to spill > or stream those many changes. If it concerns any users they can > always increase logical_decoding_work_mem. The default value is 64MB > at which point, I don't think it will matter sending the stats. Sounds good to me, I will rebase my previous patch and send a patch for this. Regards, Vignesh
Commits
-
Doc: Update logical decoding stats information.
- 0c6b92d9c6fb 14.0 landed
-
Fix tests for replication slots stats.
- fc69509131c3 14.0 landed
-
Update replication statistics after every stream/spill.
- 592f00f8dec6 14.0 landed
-
Fix the computation of slot stats for 'total_bytes'.
- 205f466282be 14.0 landed
-
Another try to fix the test case added by commit f5fc2f5b23.
- 51ef9173030c 14.0 landed
-
Use HTAB for replication slot statistics.
- 3fa17d37716f 14.0 landed
-
Fix test case added by commit f5fc2f5b23.
- c64dcc7fee5f 14.0 landed
-
Add information of total data processed to replication slot stats.
- f5fc2f5b23d1 14.0 landed
-
Use NameData datatype for slotname in stats.
- cca57c1d9bf7 14.0 landed