Re: Adding REPACK [concurrently]
vignesh C <vignesh21@gmail.com>
On Mon, 6 Apr 2026 at 15:08, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org> wrote:
>
> On 2026-Apr-06, vignesh C wrote:
>
> > On Mon, 6 Apr 2026 at 02:12, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org> wrote:
>
> > Few comments:
>
> Thanks for reviewing this patch!
>
> > 1) Can we add a comment why we should error out here, as repack
> > concurrently requires this whereas repack does not require this check.
> > Even if it is required for decoding can't it be handled by replica
> > identity full:
> > + /*
> > + * If the identity index is not set due to replica identity being, PK
> > + * might exist.
> > + */
> > + ident_idx = RelationGetReplicaIndex(rel);
> > + if (!OidIsValid(ident_idx) && OidIsValid(rel->rd_pkindex))
> > + ident_idx = rel->rd_pkindex;
> > + if (!OidIsValid(ident_idx))
> > + ereport(ERROR,
> > +
> > errcode(ERRCODE_OBJECT_NOT_IN_PREREQUISITE_STATE),
> > + errmsg("cannot process relation \"%s\"",
> > + RelationGetRelationName(rel)),
> > + errhint("Relation \"%s\" has no
> > identity index.",
> > + RelationGetRelationName(rel)));
>
> Ah, I was just rewriting that comment moments ago. I think we could
> make it work with replica identity full in theory, but I'm guessing it
> would be useless. You really need an index that lets you locate the
> affected tuples; otherwise the replay would take forever. If the table
> is big, that would make the whole thing unworkable. If the table isn't
> big, then you can probably just use straight repack without too much
> disruption.
>
> /*
> * Obtain the replica identity index -- either one that has been set
> * explicitly, or the primary key. If none of these cases apply, the
> * table cannot be repacked concurrently. It might be possible to have
> * repack work with a FULL replica identity; however that requires more
> * work and is not implemented yet.
> */
Should this be mentioned in XXX comment:
It might be possible to have repack work with a FULL replica identity;
however that requires more work and is not implemented yet.
> > 2) Do you think it will be good to add a test to simulate a case where
> > one of the swap_replation_files is successful and a failure after
> > that. We can verify that the oid should still point to old oids:
>
> Hmm, it's not clear to me in which cases this can happen. Are you
> thinking that the first swap_replation_files call dies because of
> out-of-memory?
Yes, I was thinking of that.
> Note that the really weird cases, like pg_class or mapped relations, are
> directly rejected. So we don't get into the branch with
> !RelFileNumberIsValid, and so on.
>
> I mean -- I'm not opposed to adding a test case for it. But I suspect
> it's going to be somewhat annoying to write.
I will verify this scenario through debugger.
Regards,
Vignesh
Commits
GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits
the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources.
API reference →
-
Allow old WAL recycling during REPACK CONCURRENTLY
- 45b02984e2fa 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Advance restart_lsn more eagerly in LogicalConfirmReceivedLocation
- 38470c2c1ea7 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Remove unnecessary signal handler change
- 5d48d3b14e0e 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Improve REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) error messages some more
- 378dffaf8c80 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Revert "Allow logical replication snapshots to be database-specific"
- 01a80f062146 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Move REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) test out of stock regression tests
- 4b2aa4b39cba 19 (unreleased) landed
-
REPACK: do not require REPLICATION or LOGIN
- 5dbb63fc82b7 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Add missing initialization
- 05c401d5786a 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Simplify declaration of memcpy target
- 2cff363715ef 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Reserve replication slots specifically for REPACK
- e76d8c749c31 19 (unreleased) landed
-
doc: Add an example of REPACK (CONCURRENTLY)
- 8fb95a8ab6e5 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Allow logical replication snapshots to be database-specific
- 0d3dba38c777 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Avoid different-size pointer-to-integer cast
- a3b069ef90bd 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Fix valgrind failure
- 5bcc3fbd196c 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Add CONCURRENTLY option to REPACK
- 28d534e2ae0a 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Rename cluster.c to repack.c (and corresponding .h)
- c0b53ec06309 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Allow index_create to suppress index_build progress reporting
- caec9d9fadf1 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Make index_concurrently_create_copy more general
- 33bf7318f94c 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Document the 'command' column of pg_stat_progress_repack
- a630ac5c2016 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Introduce the REPACK command
- ac58465e0618 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Toggle logical decoding dynamically based on logical slot presence.
- 67c20979ce72 19 (unreleased) cited
-
Split vacuumdb to create vacuuming.c/h
- c4067383cb2c 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Remove ReorderBufferTupleBuf structure.
- 08e6344fd642 17.0 cited
-
Revert changes to CONCURRENTLY that "sped up" Xmin advance
- 042b584c7f7d 14.4 cited
-
VACUUM: ignore indexing operations with CONCURRENTLY
- d9d076222f5b 14.0 cited