Re: Data type correction in pgstat_report_replslot function parameters

vignesh C <vignesh21@gmail.com>

From: vignesh C <vignesh21@gmail.com>
To: Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@oss.nttdata.com>
Cc: Jeevan Ladhe <jeevan.ladhe@enterprisedb.com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>
Date: 2021-04-03T01:38:57Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Fri, Apr 2, 2021 at 1:59 PM Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@oss.nttdata.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> On 2021/04/02 11:20, vignesh C wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 1, 2021 at 11:18 PM Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@oss.nttdata.com> wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> On 2021/04/02 2:18, Jeevan Ladhe wrote:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On Thu, Apr 1, 2021 at 10:20 PM vignesh C <vignesh21@gmail.com <mailto:vignesh21@gmail.com>> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>      Hi,
> >>>
> >>>      While I was reviewing replication slot statistics code, I found one
> >>>      issue in the data type used for pgstat_report_replslot function
> >>>      parameters. We pass int64 variables to the function but the function
> >>>      prototype uses int type. I I felt the function parameters should be
> >>>      int64. Attached patch fixes the same.
> >>
> >> Isn't it better to use PgStat_Counter instead of int64?
> >>
> >
> > Thanks for your comment, the updated patch contains the changes for it.
>
> Thanks for updating the patch! Pushed.

Thanks for pushing.

Regards,
Vignesh



Commits

  1. Fix pgstat_report_replslot() to use proper data types for its arguments.