Re: Documentation update of wal_retrieve_retry_interval to mention table sync worker
vignesh C <vignesh21@gmail.com>
From: vignesh C <vignesh21@gmail.com>
To: Peter Smith <smithpb2250@gmail.com>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>
Date: 2025-01-13T07:03:38Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Attachments
- v3-0001-Improve-documentation-on-table-synchronization-wo.patch (text/x-patch) patch v3-0001
On Mon, 6 Jan 2025 at 08:47, Peter Smith <smithpb2250@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi Vignesh, > > Some review comments for your v2 patch. > > ====== > doc/src/sgml/logical-replication.sgml > > AFAICT the only difference you made is changing: > FROM "a special kind of apply process" > TO "a special kind of table synchronization worker process". > > There is only ONE kind of tablesync process, so I think saying "a > special kind of table synchronization worker process" seems > misleading. I also thought maybe it is better to mention that this is > PER table. > > SUGGESTION: > ... a special table synchronization worker process per table. Thanks, the updated v3 version patch has the changes for the same. Regards, Vignesh
Commits
-
Doc: Update the interaction of tablesync with wal_retrieve_retry_interval.
- 4a0e7314f11e 18.0 landed