Re: Logical Replication of sequences
vignesh C <vignesh21@gmail.com>
Commits
GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits
the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources.
API reference →
-
Doc: Add documentation for sequence synchronization.
- 55cefadde874 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Remove unused assignment in CREATE PUBLICATION grammar.
- bfb7419b0bbe 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Add seq_sync_error_count to subscription statistics.
- f6a4c498dcf6 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Fix few issues in commit 5509055d69.
- 5a4eba558aa7 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Add sequence synchronization for logical replication.
- 5509055d6956 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Add worker type argument to logical replication worker functions.
- 3e8e05596a02 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Introduce "REFRESH SEQUENCES" for subscriptions.
- f0b3573c3aac 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Refactor logical worker synchronization code into a separate file.
- 41c674d2e31e 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Standardize use of REFRESH PUBLICATION in code and messages.
- 2436b8c047ff 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Add "ALL SEQUENCES" support to publications.
- 96b378497346 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Expose sequence page LSN via pg_get_sequence_data.
- b93172ca59f4 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Resume conflict-relevant data retention automatically.
- 0d48d393d465 19 (unreleased) cited
-
Post-commit review fixes for 228c370868.
- 1f7e9ba3ac4e 19 (unreleased) cited
-
Generate GUC tables from .dat file
- 63599896545c 19 (unreleased) cited
Attachments
- v2025029-0001-Introduce-pg_sequence_state-function-for-en.patch (text/x-patch) patch v2025029-0001
- v2025029-0004-Enhance-sequence-synchronization-during-sub.patch (text/x-patch) patch v2025029-0004
- v2025029-0003-Reorganize-tablesync-Code-and-Introduce-syn.patch (text/x-patch) patch v2025029-0003
- v2025029-0005-Documentation-for-sequence-synchronization-.patch (text/x-patch) patch v2025029-0005
- v2025029-0002-Introduce-ALL-SEQUENCES-support-for-Postgre.patch (text/x-patch) patch v2025029-0002
On Wed, 28 May 2025 at 20:52, Nisha Moond <nisha.moond412@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Thu, May 22, 2025 at 10:42 PM vignesh C <vignesh21@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >
> > The attached v20250522 patch has the changes for the same.
> >
>
> Thank you for the patches, please find comments for patch-0004.
>
> 1)
> +/*
> + * report_error_sequences
> + *
> + * Logs a warning listing all sequences that are missing on the publisher,
> + * as well as those with value mismatches relative to the subscriber.
> + */
> +static void
> +report_error_sequences(StringInfo missing_seqs, StringInfo mismatched_seqs)
>
> The function description should be updated to reflect the recent
> changes, as it now raises an error instead of issuing a warning.
>
> 2)
> + ereport(ERROR, errcode(ERRCODE_OBJECT_NOT_IN_PREREQUISITE_STATE),
> + errmsg("%s", combined_error_msg->data));
> +
> + destroyStringInfo(combined_error_msg);
> +}
>
> I think we can remove destroyStringInfo() as we will never reach here
> in case of error.
>
> 3)
> + * we want to avoid keeping this batch transaction open for extended
> + * periods so it iscurrently limited to 100 sequences per batch.
> + */
>
> typo : iscurrently / is currently
>
> 4)
> + HeapTuple tup;
> + Form_pg_sequence seqform;
> + LogicalRepSequenceInfo *seqinfo;
> +
> [...]
> + Assert(seqinfo);
>
> Since there's an assertion for 'seqinfo', it would be safer to
> initialize it to NULL to avoid any unexpected behavior.
>
> 6)
> + if (missing_seqs->len || mismatched_seqs->len)
> + report_error_sequences(missing_seqs, mismatched_seqs);
>
> I think it would be helpful to add a comment for this check, perhaps
> something like:
> /*
> * Report an error if any sequences are missing on the remote side
> * or if local sequence parameters don't match with the remote ones.
> */
> Please rephrase if needed.
These comments are handled in the attached v2025029 version patch.
Regards,
Vignesh